Ominous Nine: Cross-Validation of the Nine Dark Personality Trait Model
Subject Areas :
Rahim
Yousefi
1
(Department of Psychology, Faculty of Education and Psychology, Azarbaijan Shahid Madani University, Tabriz, Iran)
elham
farzaneh
2
(Department of Psychology, Faculty of Education & Psychology, Azarbaijan Shahid Madani University, Tabriz, Iran)
Behzad
Shalchi
3
(Department of Psychology, Shahid Madani University of Azerbaijan, Tabriz, Iran )
Keywords: Dark Traits, Egoism, Self-interest, Moral Disengagement, Psychological Entitlement.,
Abstract :
Introduction: The Nine Dark Model is an expanded model of the Dark pentad Traits, which has added egoism, self-interest, moral disengagement, and psychological entitlement to this set. The aim of study was to Cross-Validation of the nine dark personality traits model. Method: The research was descriptive-correlation. The research community was the students of Azarbaijan Shahid Madani University (6761 people including 4141 women and 2620 men) and the sample was 400 people (women=229 & men=171) who were selected voluntarily. The instruments included Dark Pentad Scale, Egoism Scale, Self-Interest Inventory, Moral Disengage Scale and Psychological Entitlement Scale. The data was analyzed by exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis using spss22 and LISREL8. Results: The results of exploratory factor analysis revealed spitfullness, self-interest, sadism, narcissism, psychological entitlement, egoism, moral disengagement, psychopathy, and Machiavellianism, which explained 58% of the variance. Confirmatory factor analysis indicated the confirmation of the nine-factor structure of the model; the fitness indices were h igher than 0.9. Internal consistency through Cronbach's alpha for components between 0.68 and 0.81 and the whole scale is 0.88 and through spilit-half for components between 0.64 and 0.79 and the whole scale is 0.81. Conclusion: The scale of nine dark personality traits is a valid and reliable instrument for clinical and research situations.
آربزی، محسن.، فولادچنگ، محبوبه. (1401). خصوصیات روانسنجی نسخه فارسی پرسشنامه مدل شش عاملی اهداف پیشرفت دانش‌آموزان دوره اوّل و دوّم متوسطه. مجله روانشناسی، 104(4): 310-325.
-ابراهیمی قوام، صغری. (1399). ویژگی¬های روانسنجی پرسشنامه ویژگی¬های نه¬گانه تاریک شخصیت موشاگن ، هیلبیگ و زتلر، 2018. فصلنامه علمی روش‌ها و مدل‌های روان‌شناختی، 11 (41): 141-158.
-بشرپور سجاد.، میری، میر نادر. (1397). نقش واسطه¬ای بی اشتیاقی اخلاقی در رابطه بین صفات تاریک شخصیت و استعداد خیانت زناشویی. مجله روانشناسی، 87 (3): 271-286.
-عطادخت، اکبر.، زردی گیکلو، بهمن.، لاله، حدیثه. (1398). بررسی ویژگی‌های روانسنجی مقیاس جدید صفات چهارگانه تاریک شخصیت. مجله روانشناسی،91 (3): 303-319.
-محسنین، شهریار.، اسفیدانی، محمدرحیم. (1392). مدل‌سازی معادلات ساختاری به کمک نرم‌افزار لیزرل. تهران: مهربان نشر.
-میرزا زاده، افسانه. (1398). اعتباریابی مدل صفات پنج‌گانه تاریک شخصیت. پایان¬نامه کارشناسی ارشد روان¬شناسی. دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روان-شناسی. دانشگاه شهید مدنی آذربایجان.
-هومن، حیدر علی. (1391). مدل‌یابی معادلات ساختاری با کاربرد نرم‌افزار لیزرل، تهران: انتشارات سمت.
-یوسفی، رحیم.، پیری، فائزه. (1395). ویژگی¬های روانسنجی نسخه فارسی پرسشنامه دوجین کثیف. مجله روانپزشکی و روان¬شناسی بالینی، 22 (1):67-76.
-یوسفی، رحیم.، ایمان¬زاد، آیسان. (1397). اعتباریابی مدل صفات چهارگانه تاریک شخصیت. مجله روانپزشکی و روان¬شناسی بالینی، 24 (2): 190-201.
-یوسفی، رحیم.، احمدی، عزت‌الله.، میرزا زاده، افسانه. (1400). اعتباریابی مدل صفات پنج‌گانه تاریک شخصیت. مجله پژوهش‌های نوین روان‌شناختی، 16(61): 95-110.
American Psychiatric Association. (2022). Desk Reference to the Diagnostic Criteria from DSM-5-Text Revised (TR). American Psychiatric Association Publishing.
Bandura, A. (2002). Selective moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency. Journal of moral education. 31(2), 101-119.
Bandura, A., Barbaranelli, C., Caprara, G. V., & Pastorelli, C. (1996). Mechanisms of moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency. Journal of personality and social psychology. 71(2), 364-374.
Bereczkei, T. (2018). MACHIAVELLIANISM: The Psychology of Manipulation. New York: Routledge.
Buckels, E. E., Jones, D. N., & Paulhus, D. L. (2013). Behavioral confirmation of everyday sadism. Psychological Science. 24, 2201–2209.
Campbell, W. K., Bonacci, A. M., Shelton, J., Exline, J. J., & Bushman, B. J. (2004). Psychological entitlement: Interpersonal consequences and validation of a self-report measure. Journal of Personality Assessment. 83, 29–45.
Chabrol, H., Van Leeuwen, N., Rodgers, R., & Séjourné, N. (2009). Contributions of psychopathic, narcissistic, Machiavellian, and sadistic personality traits to juvenile delinquency. Personality and Individual Differences. 47, 734–739.
De Vries, R. E., & van Kampen, D. (2010). The HEXACO and 5DPT models of personality: A comparison and their relationships with psychopathy, egoism, pretentiousness, immorality, and Machiavellianism. Journal of Personality Disorders. 24(2), 244-257.
Ferreiros, L., & Clemente, M. (2022). Dark personality and intimate partner relationships in young adults. Acta psychologica. 225, 103549.
Furnham, A., Richards, S.C., & Paulhus, D.L. (2013). The dark triad of personality: A 10-year review. Social and Personality Psychology Compass. 7(3), 199-216.
Gerbasi, M. E., & Prentice, D. A. (2013). The self- and other-interest inventory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 105, 495–514.
Gini, G., Pozzoli, T., & Hymel, S. (2014). Moral disengagement among children and youth: A meta‐analytic review of links to aggressive behavior. Aggressive behavior. 40(1), 56-68.
Grubbs, J. B., Exline, J. J., & Campbell, W. K. (2013). I deserve better and god knows it! Psychological entitlement as a robust predictor of anger at God. Psychology of religion and spirituality. 5(3), 192-200.
Kline, P. (2011). An Easy Guide to Factor Analysis.New York, USA: Routledge.
Jones, D. N., & Paulhus, D. L. (2014). Introducing the short Dark Triad (SD3): A brief measure of dark personality traits. Assessment, 21, 28–41.
Marcus, D. K., Zeigler-Hill, V., Mercer, S. H., Norris, A. L. (2014). The psychology of spite and the measurement of spitefulness. Psychological Assessment. 26, 563–574.
Méndez, I., Liccardi, G., & Ruiz-Esteban, C. (2020). Mechanisms of moral disengagement used to justify school violence in Sicilian primary school. European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education. 10(3), 682-690.
Moore, C., Detert, J. R., Treviño, L., Baker, V. L., & Mayer, D. M. (2012). Why Employees Do Bad Things: Moral Disengagement and Unethical Organizational Behavior. Personnel Psychology. 65, 1–48.
Moshagen, M., Hilbig, B. E., & Zettler, I. (2018). The dark core of personality. Psychological review. 125(5), 656.
O’Meara, A., Davies, J., Hammond, S. (2011). The psychometric properties and utility of the Short Sadistic Impulse Scale (SSIS). Psychological Assessment. 23(2), 523–31.
Paulhus, D. L., Williams, K. M. (2002). The Dark Triad of personality: Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Journal of Research in Personality. 36,556–563.
Pinker, S. (2011). The better angels of our nature: Why violence has declined. New York, NY: Viking.
Plouffe, R.A., Saklofske, D.H., & Smith, M.M. (2017). The Assessment of Sadistic Personality: Preliminary psychometric evidence for a new measure. Personality and Individual Differences. 104, 166-171.
Weigel, R. H., Hessing, D. J., & Elffers, H. (1999). Egoism: Concept, measurement and implications for deviance. Psychology, Crime & Law. 5, 349–378.
Weiß, M., Iotzov, V., Zhou, Y., & Hein, G. (2022). The bright and dark sides of egoism. Frontiers in Psychiatry. 13, 1054065.
VandenBos, G. R. (2015). APA dictionary of psychology. American Psychological Association.
Zamora, J., Ungson, N. D., & Seidman, G. (2022). The end justifies the me: Self-interest moderates the relationship between Dark Triad traits and utilitarian moral decisions. Personality and Individual Differences. 184, 111134.
Zeigler-Hill. V., Marcus, D.K. (2016). The dark side of personality: Science and practice in social, personality, and clinical psychology. Washington D.C: American Psychological Association.
Żemojtel-Piotrowska, M., Baran, T., Clinton, A., Piotrowski, J., Baltatescu, S., & Van Hiel, A. (2013). Materialism, subjective well-being, and entitlement. Journal of Social Research and Policy. 4(2), 79-91.