مدل ساختاری رابطه شادنفروید بر اساس احساسات با نقش واسطه‌ای فضای مجازی در دانش‌آموزان شهر همدان

چکیده مقاله :

پژوهش حاضر با هدف بررسی مدل ساختاری رابطه شادنفروید بر اساس ویژگی‌های شخصیتی با نقش واسطه‌ای فضای مجازی در بین دانش‌آموزان متوسطه دوم شهر همدان در سال 1403 انجام شد. این پژوهش توصیفی از نوع مدل‌یابی معادلات ساختاری بود. نمونه آماری شامل 363 دانش‌آموز بود که به روش تصادفی ساده انتخاب شدند. داده‌ها با استفاده از پرسشنامه‌های شادنفروید، پنج عاملی شخصیت و فضای مجازی جمع‌آوری و با استفاده از مدل‌یابی معادلات ساختاری در نرم‌افزارهای SPSS 28 و Smart PLS 3/3 تحلیل شدند.

 

نتایج نشان داد که مدل پژوهش از برازش مناسبی برخوردار است. همچنین، احساسات هم به طور مستقیم و هم با واسطه‌گری فضای مجازی با شادنفروید در دانش‌آموزان رابطه معناداری دارد و فضای مجازی نقش واسطه‌ای قوی در این رابطه ایفا می‌کند. بین احساسات و فضای مجازی و همچنین بین فضای مجازی و شادنفروید رابطه معناداری مشاهده شد؛ به طوری که با افزایش استفاده از فضای مجازی، میزان شادنفروید در دانش‌آموزان افزایش می‌یابد.

 

بر اساس این یافته‌ها، شادنفروید به عنوان یک پدیده منفی در نوجوانان نیازمند توجه بیشتر است و می‌توان با کنترل احساسات دانش‌آموزان و مدیریت استفاده آن‌ها از فضای مجازی، میزان شادنفروید را در آنان کنترل یا کاهش داد

چکیده انگلیسی :

This study investigated the structural relationship between schadenfreude, based on personality traits, and the mediating role of cyberspace among 363 high school students in Hamedan, Iran, in 2024. A descriptive research design using structural equation modeling was employed. Participants were selected via simple random sampling from a population of 6,527 students. Data were collected using standardized questionnaires assessing schadenfreude, the Five-Factor Model of personality, and cyberspace usage. The collected data were analyzed using SPSS 28 and Smart PLS 3.3 software, including descriptive and inferential statistics and structural equation modeling.

The findings indicated that the proposed model demonstrated good psychological properties and fit indices. Notably, emotions showed a significant relationship with schadenfreude, both directly and indirectly through the mediating influence of cyberspace. Cyberspace acted as a strong mediator in the relationship between emotions and schadenfreude. Furthermore, a significant positive relationship was found between cyberspace usage and schadenfreude; increased cyberspace use correlated with higher levels of schadenfreude among students (p < 0.05).

The study concluded that schadenfreude is a significant negative phenomenon in adolescents requiring further examination. The results suggest that managing students' emotions and their use of cyberspace could be effective strategies for controlling or reducing schadenfreude in this population.

منابع و مأخذ:

References
1. Tomasello, M. (2014). The ultra‐social animal. European journal of social psychology, 44(3), 187-194.
2. Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley.
3. Li, X., McAllister, D. J., Ilies, R., & Gloor, J. L. (2019). Schadenfreude: A counternormative observer response to workplace mistreatment. Academy of Management Review, 44(2), 360-376.
4. van Dijk, W. W., Ouwerkerk, J. W., Smith, R. H., & Cikara, M. (2015). The role of selfevaluation and envy in schadenfreude. European Review of Social Psychology, 26(1), 247-282.
5. Ortony, A., Clore, G. L., & Collins, A. (1990). The cognitive structure of emotions. Cambridge university press.
6. Smith, R.H., Powell, C.A.J., Combs, D.J.Y., & Schurtz, D. R. (2009). Exploring the when and why of schadenfreude. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 3, 530–546. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2009.00181.x.
7. Tracy, J. L., Robins, R., & Tangney, J.P. (2007). The Self-Conscious Emotions. Theory and Research, The Guilford Press.
8. Tracy, J. L., & Robins, R. W. (2004). Putting the Self into Self-Conscious Emotions: A Theoretical Model. Psychological Inquiry, 15(2), 103-125.
9. Feather, N. T., & Sherman, R. (2002). Envy, resentment, schadenfreude, and sympathy: Reactions to deserved and undeserved achievement and subsequent failure. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(7), 953-961.
10. Erzi, S. (2021). Examination of schadenfreude in terms developmental psychology perspective, Sociology and Psychology Sciences Research, 2(12).
11. Eisenberg, N., Fabes, R. A., & Spinrad, T. L. (2006). Handbook of child psychology (Vol. 3). NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
12. Hoffman, M. "Development of empathic distress." Empathy and moral development: Implications for caring and justice (2000): 63-61.
13. Batson, C. and Powell, A. (2003) Altruism and Prosocial Behavior. In: Millon, T. and Lerner, M., Eds., Handbook of psychology Volumen 5 Personality and Social Psychology. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken.
14. Schulz, K., Rudolph, A., Tscharaktschiew, N., & Rudolph, U. (2013). Daniel has fallen into a muddy puddle Schadenfreude or sympathy? British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 31(4), 363-378.
15. Smith, R.H., Turner, T. J., Garonzik, R., Leach, C. W., Urch-Druskat, V., & Weston, C.M. (1996). Envy and schadenfreude. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22(2), 158-168.
16. Leach, C. W., Spears, R., Branscombe, N. R., & Doosje, B. (2003). Malicious pleasure: Schadenfreude at the suffering of another group. Journal of personality and social psychology, 84(5), 932.
17. Hareli, S., & Weiner, B. (2002). Social Emotions and Personality Inferences: A Scaffold for a New Direction in the Study of Achievement Motivation. Key Speech at the 8th WATM & Motivation and Emotion Conference, Moscow, June, 12-15.
18. Schindler, R., Körner, A., Bauer, S., Hadji, S., & Rudolph, U. (2015). Causes and consequences of schadenfreude and sympathy: A developmental analysis. PloS one, 10(10), e0137669.
19. Steinbeis, N., & Singer, T. (2013). The effects of social comparison on social emotions and behavior during childhood: The ontogeny of envy and Schadenfreude predicts developmental changes in equity-related decisions. Journal of experimental child psychology, 115(1), 198-209.
20. Eisenberg, N. (2000). Emotion, Regulation, and Moral Development. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 665-697.
21. Watanabe, H. (2019). Sharing schadenfreude and late adolescents’ self-esteem: does sharing schadenfreude of a deserved misfortune enhance self-esteem?. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 24(4), 438-446.
22. Feather, N. (2014). Deservingness and Schadenfreude, Publisher; Cambridge University Press.
23. Watanabe, H. (2014) Assessment of Dementia People. Care Manager, 16, 56-59.
24. Jung, K. (2017). Happiness as an additional antecedent of schadenfreude. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 12(2), 186-196.
25. Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., and Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of Facebook “friends:” Social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. J. Comput. Med. Commun. 12, 1143–1168. doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00367.x.
26. Pang, B., and Lee, L. (2008). Opinion Mining and sentiment analysis. Found. Trends Inf. Retr. 2, 1–135.
27. Go, A., Huang, L., and Bhayany, R. (2009). Twitter sentiment analysis. Entropy 17,252–269.
28. Burke, M., Marlow, C., and Lento, T. (2010). “Social network activity and social well-being,” in Conference on Human Factors. Computing Systems, Vol. 3, New York, NY: ACM, 1909–1912. doi: 10.1145/1753326.1753613.
29. Bollen, J., Mao, H., and Pepe, A. (2011). Modeling public mood and emotion: twitter sentiment and socioeconomic phenomena. Icwsm 11,450-453.
30. Ceron, A., Curini, L., and Iacus, S. M. (2014). Social Media and Sentyment Analysis. Berlino: Springer.
31. Marmo, R. (2016). Social Media Mining. Estrarre e Analizzare Informazioni dai Social Media. Milano: Hoepli Editore.
32. Pozzi, F. A., Fersini, E., Messina, E., and Liu, B. (2016). Sentiment Analysis in Social Network. Burlington: Morgan Kaufman.
33. یگانه، نرگس؛ بخشی پور رودسری، عباس؛ محمود علیلو، مجید. (1400). ارزیابی ساختار درونی مقیاس شدت شادنفرود: یک مطالعه‌ی تحلیل عاملی، روان‌شناسی بالینی، دوره 13، شماره 3، شماره پیاپی 51: 49-58.
34. Harmon-Jones, C., Bastian, B., and Harmon-Jones, E. (2016). The Discrete Emotions Questionnaire: A New Tool for Measuring State Self-Reported Emotions, PLoS ONE 11(8): e0159915. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0159915.
35. Kim, J., et al. (2002). Study of internet addiction: Status, causes, and remedies-focusing on the alienation factor, International Journal of Human Ecology.
36. احمدپور، جمال؛ اصغری، سیده زهرا؛ سلطانیان، علیرضا؛ محمدی، یونس؛ پورالعجل، جلال. (1397). بررسی روایی و پایایی ویرایش فارسی پرسشنامه استفاده آسیب زا از اینترنت، نشریه: اپیدمیولوژی ایران، دوره 14، شماره 1، صفحات :53-62.
37. Moss, S., Prosser, H., Costello, H., Simpson, N., Patel, P., Rowe, S., Turner, S., & Hatton, C. (1998). Reliability and validity of the PAS-ADD Checklist for detecting psychiatric disorders in adults with intellectual disability, J Intellect Disabil Res:42 ( Pt 2):173-83. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2788.1998.00116.x.
38. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312.
39. Magner, N., Welker, R. B., & Johnson, G. G. (1996). The interactive effects of participation and outcome favourability on turnover intentions and evaluations of supervisors. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 69(2), 135–143. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.1996.tb00605.x.
40. Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sinkovics, R. R. (2009). The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. In New challenges to international marketing. Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
41. Stone, M. (1974). Cross-Validatory Choice and Assessment of Statistical Predictions. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological), 36(2), 111-147. doi: 10.2307/2984809.
42. Geisser, S. (1975). The Predictive Sample Reuse Method with Applications. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 70(350), 320-328. doi: 10.1080/01621459.1975.10479865.
43. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
44. Tenenhaus, M., Amato, S., Esposito Vinzi, V. (2004). A global goodness-offit index for PLS structural equation modeling, Proceedings of the XLII SIS Scientific Meeting, Vol. Contributed Papers, CLEUP, Padova, pp. 739–742.
45. Wetzels, R., Raaijmakers, J. G. W., Jakab, E., & Wagenmakers, E.J. (2009). How to quantify support for and against the null hypothesis: A flexible WinBUGS implementation of a default Bayesian t–test, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16: 752-760.
46. Shemesh, D.O., & Heiman, T. (2022). Cyberbullying Victimization in Adolescence: The Relationships with Loneliness and Depressive Mood, Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties 17(3). DOI:10.1080/13632752.2012.704227.
47. Rashid, A., & Arooj, F. (2021). Effect of Social Comparison on Schadenfreude: Moderating Role of Interpersonal Jealousy among Adolescents, Journal of Peace Development & Communication volume 05(issue 2):314-324. DOI:10.36968/JPDC-V05-I02-28.
48. Kraut, R., Patterson, M., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukhopadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (2008). Internet paradox: A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being? American Psychologist, 53(9), 1017–1031.
49. Gong, F., Gong, Z., Liu, H., Yi, P., Jia, Y., Zhuang, J., Shu, J., Huang, X., & Wu, Y. (2023). The Impact of Problematic Internet Use on Adolescent Loneliness-Chain Mediation Effects of Social Support and Family Communication, Psychology Research and Behavior Management » Volume 17, Pages 1903-1916. DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S443349.
50. Wei, L., & Liu, L. (2020). Reactions to Others’ Misfortune on Social Media: Effects of Homophily and Publicness on Schadenfreude, Empathy, and Perceived Deservingness, Computers in Human Behavior 102:1-13. DOI:10.1016/j.chb.2019.08.002.
51. Valkenburg, P. M., & Peter, J. (2011). Online communication and adolescent well-being: What do we know and where do we go? Adolescent Research Review, 3(2), 121–140.
52. Klimecki, O.M. (2019). The Role of Empathy and Compassion in Conflict Resolution, Emotion Review, Volume 11, Issue 4. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073919838609.
53. Smith, R. H. (2013). The joy of others' misery. Oxford University Press.
54. van de Ven, N., Hoogland, C. E., Smith, R. H., van Dijk, W. W., & Ouwerkerk, J. W. (2014). The dark side of social comparison: How upward comparisons can lead to downward comparison tendencies and schadenfreude. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40(2), 271-281.
55. Chua, T. H. J., & Chang, L. (2016). The dark side of social media: When social comparison increases schadenfreude. Computers in Human Behavior, 55, 192-199.
56. Sundar, S. S. (2008). The MAIN model: A heuristic approach to understanding technology effects on attitude change, behavior change, and social cognition. The Cambridge Handbook of Visceral Influences, 117-140.
57. Ilia, I., Rad, D., Dughi, T., & Manuela, E.A. (2020). Schadenfreude and life satisfaction: effect of anger and aggressiveness, Technium Social Sciences Journal (ISSN: 2668-7798)(28(1)):76-88. DOI:10.47577/tssj.v28i1.5808.
58. Smith, R.H., Turner, T.J., Garonzik, R., & Wayne Leach, C. (2016). Envy and Schadenfreude, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 22(2).
59. Yıldırım, F., Çakır, Z., Özdemir, S., Trout, İ.Y., Bayramoğlu, A., Ekinci, O., Atasever Belli, S., Yarbaşı, İ.Y., Mutlu, M., Akın, R., Yaşar, B., Yıldırım, S.K., Kaşdarma, E., & Yılmazcan, B. (2024). Perceptions of patients and their relatives about schadenfreude towards doctors, Heliyon, Volume 10, Issue 13, e32983. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e32983.
60. Smith, R. H., & Kim, S. H. (2007). Comprehending envy. In R. H. Smith (Ed.), Envy: Theory and research (pp. 3–22). Oxford University Press.
61. Ohbuchi, K. I., & Tsutsui, K. (2004). Schadenfreude: Feeling pleasure at another's misfortune. Japanese Psychological Research, 46(3), 147–156.
62. Yanyan, Q., Weizhi, N., Huajian, C., Haiyan, W., & Xun, L. (2020). Empathy or schadenfreude? Social value orientation and affective responses to gambling results, Personality and Individual Differences, Volume 153, 15, 109619.
63. Hoffman, M. L. (2000). Empathy and moral development: Implications for caring and justice. Cambridge University Press.
64. Cikara, M., Botvinick, M. M., & Fiske, S. T. (2011). Us versus them: Social identity shapes visual processing, Psychological Science, 22(11), 1363-1369.
65. Lin, W., Cen, Z., & Chen, Y. (2024). The impact of social media addiction on the negative emotions of adolescent athletes: the mediating role of physical appearance comparisons and sleep, Public Mental Health, Volume 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1452769.
66. Vidal, C., Lhaksampa, T., Miller, L., & Platt, R. (2020). Social media use and depression in adolescents: a scoping review, International Rev Psychiatry, 32(3):235–253. doi:10.1080/09540261.2020.1720623.
67. Twenge, J. M., Martin, G. N., & Spitzberg, B. H. (2018). Trends in U.S. adolescents’ media use, 1976–2016: The dramatic rise of digital media, the decline of TV, and the (near) demise of print. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 7(1), 1–17.
68. Valkenburg, P. M., & Peter, J. (2011). Online communication among adolescents: An integrated model of its attraction, uses, and effects. Journal of Adolescent Health, 48(2), 121-127.
69. Tokunaga, R. S. (2010). Following you home from school: A critical review and synthesis of research on cyberbullying victimization. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(3), 277–287.
70. Przybylski, A. K., & Weinstein, N. (2017). A test of the goldilocks hypothesis: Quantifying the relations between digital-screen use and the mental well-being of adolescents. Psychological Science, 28(2), 204–215.
71. Mikami, A.Y., Szwedo, D.E., Khalis, A., Jia, M., & Na, J.J. (2019). Online Social Interactions Predict Academic and Emotional Adjustment in the Transition to University, Journal Res Adolesc, 29(1):210-224. doi: 10.1111/jora.12377. Epub 2018 Feb 5.
72. Twenge, J.M., & Campbell, W. K. (2018). Associations between screen time and lower psychological well-being among children and adolescents: Evidence from a population-based study, Preventive Medicine Reports, Volume 12, December 2018, Pages 271-283.
73. Walther, J. B. (1996). Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research, 23(1), 3-43.
74. Coleman, J. C., & Hendry, L. B. (2009). The nature of adolescence. Routledge.
75. Festinger, L. (2004). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7(2), 117-140.
76. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227-268.
77. Zillmann, D. (2018). Mood management through selective exposure to dispositional affect. In L. Donohew, H. E. Sypher, & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Communication, social cognition, and affect (pp. 147–166). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
78. Riaz, H., Khanam, H., Arshad, F., & Asif, A. (2023). Relationship and difference of levels between Schadenfreude, social media addiction and social comparison among adults and adolescents, European Journal of Theoretical and Applied Sciences 1(2):149-160. DOI:10.59324/ejtas.2023.1(2).15.
79. Suler, J. R. (2014). The online disinhibition effect. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 7(3), 321-326.